I Observed a communication among teachers and preschoolers on an activitity "Pick a Job" at the circle time. The teacher asked children questions to direct them: "if your names start with letter A, go to get your job." "If your names start with T and Z, go to get your job. If your name starts with J, go to get your job." "if your name starts with S, go get a job." When a child reported to the teacher "I am book helper, I am book helper, I am book helper," there was no response. Another child said: "I am book-pack helper," there was no response from the teacher. The teacher was continuing to call the children to pick a job.
The
first question come to my mind is the same as Rainer (2010) states "what
is the teacher's purpose in asking these questions?" Then come to other
question: how might the teacher promote children's thinking and encourage their
participation in authentic conversations? "Teacher talk is a powerful
classroom tool. Language has cultural and psychological functions-communication
and thinking." (Rainer Dangei & Durden, 2010) I saw the teacher's talk
did provide direction or instruction, correcting/redirecting behavior, which
stated in Rainer's work as the functions of teacher language. However, I think
something was missing, which is the types of questions and statements teacher
use with children that have an effect on children's thinking and extends
children's language.(Rainer Dangei & Durden, 2010). Rainer suggested a
preschool teacher using language to communicate with children for seven primary
functions: 1. encouraging participation; 2. responding to children's needs and
ideas; 3. managing the class or providing the necessary instruction; 4.
fostering children's language, 5. conveying ideas, 6. assessing children's
knowledge; 7. promoting children's thinking. The teacher's language used in the
"pick a job" activity has missed some these functions. It did not
encourage participation; did not respond children's needs and ideas; did not
foster children's language; did not assess children's knowledge.
I
believe the activity is good for children develop in many dimension especial in
language. In my view, this activity is for teacher to help children learn speak
and letters by asking short questions in conversation such as "what is the
first letter of your name?" "Can you spell your name?" "Can
you find your name here?" "What do you like to do today?" also,
for teacher to help children learn classroom environment, as well as role
players. There would be a lot of dialogues that promotes children's thinking
and learning.
I
believe the children like the activity; they are interesting in a job as a role
player and excited about their roles. They could have learned more about each
job through conversation with the teacher. For example, when a child said,
"I am book help." the teacher would have responded "you chose
the book helper, you like book, which book would like to choose for us to
read?" these questions would support children self-identity. Stephenson's idea "Stepping back" refers to a way of communication between an adult and a
child. The adult allows the child leading/starting the activities that attracted
child. The adult focus on the child's voice and keeps the child at the
forefront at every stage. "Stepping back” strategy benefits a adult
listening/hearing children voice/interesting (Stephenson, 2009). The teacher
would have used stepping back strategy to listen children when a child run away from group and was not listening. The teacher might have asked what was the child going to do, Which would have helped the child with conversation.
I have
learned a lot through this week course materials. The functions of teacher
language will guide me in using appropriate language in the classroom. The
"stepping back" way will remind me of listening to children, which is
important to support their learning and developing.
References
Rainer Dangei, J., &
Durden, T. R. (2010). The nature of teacher talk during small group activities.
YC: Young Children, 65(1), 74-81.
Stephenson, A. (2009).
Conversations with a 2-year-old. YC: Young Children, 64(2), 90-95.
Hi Sara,
ReplyDeleteYour discussion of teacher talk is great. It is very important that teacher talk occur as it is such a powerful tool to facilitate open conversation among students—“teachers' words and the way they use them create meaning for children as well as for themselves” (Rainer Dangei, J., & Durden, T. R., 2010).
Reference
Rainer Dangei, J., & Durden, T. R. (2010). The nature of teacher talk during small group activities. YC: Young Children, 65(1), 74-81.